Overall
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton
- 108.3
- Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
- 111.1
Diff +2.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue is 2.6% more expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton.
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA is 2.6% more expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 111.1 vs 108.3). A $100,000 salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton buys about the same as $102,648 in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:WA 108.3→111.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.9 RPP
Diff +4.3 RPP
Diff -56.0 RPP
Diff +2.9 RPP
| Category | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 108.3 | 111.1 | +2.9 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 104.0 | +4.3 |
| Services | 148.8 | 92.8 | -56.0 |
| Rents | 148.4 | 151.3 | +2.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue is 56.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA is 2.6% more expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.9-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton to $102,648 in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton would need to be in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue for the same purchasing power:
| In Boston-Cambridge-Newton | In Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,324 | +$1,324 |
| $75,000 | $76,986 | +$1,986 |
| $100,000 | $102,648 | +$2,648 |
| $150,000 | $153,972 | +$3,972 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (108.3 → 111.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue is 2.6% more expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton. The overall cost index is 111.1 vs 108.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton has the same purchasing power as $102,648 in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Boston-Cambridge-Newton are indexed at 148.4 while Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue is at 151.3 (national average = 100). Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.