Boise City vs Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 10% more expensive than Boise City.

10% more expensive

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH is 10% more expensive than Boise City, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.3 vs 98.4). A $100,000 salary in Boise City buys about the same as $110,036 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 98.4 (Boise City) vs 108.3 (Boston-Cambridge-Newton)
  • $100k in Boise City ≈ $110,036 purchasing power in Boston-Cambridge-Newton
  • Services drives the gap (+78.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ID:MA 98.4→108.3

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE ID × MA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Boise City, ID and Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 9.9 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Boston-Cambridge-Newton is above 100 while Boise City is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Services leads the difference, with Boston-Cambridge-Newton 78.1 points higher than Boise City. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Boise City to $110,036 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Boise City
98.4
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Goods
Boise City
96.2
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
99.7
Services
Boise City
70.7
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.8
Rents
Boise City
105.6
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
148.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Boise City would need to be in Boston-Cambridge-Newton for the same purchasing power:

In Boise City In Boston-Cambridge-Newton Difference
$50,000 $55,018 +$5,018
$75,000 $82,527 +$7,527
$100,000 $110,036 +$10,036
$150,000 $165,055 +$15,055
$ in Boise City = in Boston-Cambridge-Newton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.4 → 108.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Boise City
98.4
Cost Index
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Boston-Cambridge-Newton more expensive than Boise City?

Boston-Cambridge-Newton is 10% more expensive than Boise City. The overall cost index is 108.3 vs 98.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton equals $100K in Boise City?

A $100,000 salary in Boise City has the same purchasing power as $110,036 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Boise City and Boston-Cambridge-Newton?

Rents in Boise City are indexed at 105.6 while Boston-Cambridge-Newton is at 148.4 (national average = 100). Boston-Cambridge-Newton has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.