Overall
- Birmingham
- 91.6
- Pueblo
- 91.8
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pueblo is 0.1% more expensive than Birmingham.
Pueblo, CO is 0.1% more expensive than Birmingham, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.8 vs 91.6). A $100,000 salary in Birmingham buys about the same as $100,129 in Pueblo; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:CO 91.6→91.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Birmingham, AL and Pueblo, CO are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pueblo is 1.9 points lower. But services and rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Birmingham to $100,129 in Pueblo, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -0.3 RPP
Diff -1.9 RPP
Diff -0.6 RPP
| Category | Birmingham | Pueblo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.6 | 91.8 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 96.1 | -0.3 |
| Services | 83.8 | 81.9 | -1.9 |
| Rents | 71.9 | 71.3 | -0.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Birmingham and Pueblo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.3 to 0.1 RPP points. Pueblo remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (13.7 to 1.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Birmingham RPP | Pueblo RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.7 | 91.4 | 1.3 points Birmingham higher |
| 2012 | 93.7 | 96.2 | 2.5 points Pueblo higher |
| 2016 | 94.1 | 93.2 | 0.9 points Birmingham higher |
| 2020 | 91.4 | 90.1 | 1.2 points Birmingham higher |
| 2024 | 91.6 | 91.8 | 0.1 points Pueblo higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Birmingham would need to be in Pueblo for the same purchasing power:
| In Birmingham | In Pueblo | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,064 | +$64 |
| $75,000 | $75,097 | +$97 |
| $100,000 | $100,129 | +$129 |
| $150,000 | $150,193 | +$193 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.6 → 91.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pueblo is 0.1% more expensive than Birmingham. The overall cost index is 91.8 vs 91.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Birmingham has the same purchasing power as $100,129 in Pueblo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Birmingham are indexed at 71.9 while Pueblo is at 71.3 (national average = 100). Birmingham has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.