Overall
- Birmingham
- 91.6
- Lincoln
- 91.6
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lincoln is 0.1% less expensive than Birmingham.
Lincoln, NE is 0.1% less expensive than Birmingham, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.6 vs 91.6). A $100,000 salary in Birmingham buys about the same as $99,931 in Lincoln; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:NE 91.6→91.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Birmingham, AL and Lincoln, NE are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Lincoln is 12.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Birmingham corresponds to $99,931 in Lincoln.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -2.3 RPP
Diff -7.0 RPP
Diff +12.4 RPP
| Category | Birmingham | Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.6 | 91.6 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 94.1 | -2.3 |
| Services | 83.8 | 76.8 | -7.0 |
| Rents | 71.9 | 84.2 | +12.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Birmingham would need to be in Lincoln for the same purchasing power:
| In Birmingham | In Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,966 | $-34 |
| $75,000 | $74,948 | $-52 |
| $100,000 | $99,931 | $-69 |
| $150,000 | $149,897 | $-103 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.6 → 91.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lincoln is 0.1% less expensive than Birmingham. The overall cost index is 91.6 vs 91.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Birmingham has the same purchasing power as $99,931 in Lincoln. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Birmingham are indexed at 71.9 while Lincoln is at 84.2 (national average = 100). Lincoln has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.