Overall
- Binghamton
- 92.9
Diff -0.1 RPP
Binghamton vs Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.1% less expensive than Binghamton.
0.1% less expensive
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA is 0.1% less expensive than Binghamton, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Binghamton buys about the same as $99,852 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (Binghamton) vs 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington)
- $100k in Binghamton ≈ $99,852 purchasing power in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
- Services drives the gap (-59.9 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:LA 92.9→92.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE NY × LA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Binghamton, NY and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 59.9 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Binghamton to $99,852 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Binghamton
- 99.7
Diff -6.0 RPP
Services
- Binghamton
- 131.6
Diff -59.9 RPP
Rents
- Binghamton
- 69.7
Diff +15.8 RPP
| Category | Binghamton | Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.7 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 93.7 | -6.0 |
| Services | 131.6 | 71.7 | -59.9 |
| Rents | 69.7 | 85.4 | +15.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Binghamton 92.9
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 92.7
Goods
Binghamton 99.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 93.7
Services
Binghamton 131.6
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 71.7
Rents
Binghamton 69.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 85.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Binghamton would need to be in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington for the same purchasing power:
| In Binghamton | In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,926 | $-74 |
| $75,000 | $74,889 | $-111 |
| $100,000 | $99,852 | $-148 |
| $150,000 | $149,779 | $-221 |
$ in Binghamton = in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Slidell-Mandeville-Covington more expensive than Binghamton?
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.1% less expensive than Binghamton. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington equals $100K in Binghamton?
A $100,000 salary in Binghamton has the same purchasing power as $99,852 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Binghamton and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?
Rents in Binghamton are indexed at 69.7 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.