Overall
- Binghamton
- 92.9
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +10.8 RPP
Binghamton vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 11.6% more expensive than Binghamton.
11.6% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 11.6% more expensive than Binghamton, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Binghamton buys about the same as $111,638 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (Binghamton) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Binghamton ≈ $111,638 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Rents drives the gap (+47.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WA 92.9→103.7
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE NY × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Binghamton
- 99.7
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff +5.3 RPP
Services
- Binghamton
- 131.6
Diff -39.9 RPP
Rents
- Binghamton
- 69.7
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff +47.0 RPP
| Category | Binghamton | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 103.7 | +10.8 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.0 | +5.3 |
| Services | 131.6 | 91.7 | -39.9 |
| Rents | 69.7 | 116.7 | +47.0 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Binghamton 92.9
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Binghamton 99.7
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Binghamton 131.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Binghamton 69.7
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 47.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Binghamton, NY and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.8 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Binghamton is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Binghamton corresponds to $111,638 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Binghamton would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Binghamton | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $55,819 | +$5,819 |
| $75,000 | $83,728 | +$8,728 |
| $100,000 | $111,638 | +$11,638 |
| $150,000 | $167,456 | +$17,456 |
$ in Binghamton = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Binghamton and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 8.3 to 10.8 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 20.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (60.3 to 39.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Binghamton RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.0 | 105.4 | 8.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 94.9 | 101.3 | 6.4 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 96.1 | 106.0 | 10.0 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 96.9 | 101.9 | 5.0 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 103.7 | 10.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Binghamton?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 11.6% more expensive than Binghamton. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Binghamton?
A $100,000 salary in Binghamton has the same purchasing power as $111,638 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Binghamton and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Binghamton are indexed at 69.7 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.