Overall
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 90.0
- Rome
- 90.2
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rome is 0.1% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur.
Rome, GA is 0.1% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.0). A $100,000 salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur buys about the same as $100,128 in Rome; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:GA 90.0→90.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX and Rome, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Rome is 10.7 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Beaumont-Port Arthur corresponds to $100,128 in Rome.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff +7.6 RPP
Diff -10.7 RPP
| Category | Beaumont-Port Arthur | Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.0 | 90.2 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.3 | +2.5 |
| Services | 83.1 | 90.7 | +7.6 |
| Rents | 70.9 | 60.3 | -10.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Beaumont-Port Arthur and Rome share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.4 to 0.1 RPP points. Rome remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 23.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.7 to 7.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Beaumont-Port Arthur RPP | Rome RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 93.4 | 88.0 | 5.4 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2012 | 93.3 | 86.3 | 7.0 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2016 | 94.8 | 88.3 | 6.5 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2020 | 90.1 | 86.3 | 3.8 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2024 | 90.0 | 90.2 | 0.1 points Rome higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur would need to be in Rome for the same purchasing power:
| In Beaumont-Port Arthur | In Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,064 | +$64 |
| $75,000 | $75,096 | +$96 |
| $100,000 | $100,128 | +$128 |
| $150,000 | $150,192 | +$192 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.0 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rome is 0.1% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur has the same purchasing power as $100,128 in Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Beaumont-Port Arthur are indexed at 70.9 while Rome is at 60.3 (national average = 100). Beaumont-Port Arthur has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.