Beaumont-Port Arthur vs Las Cruces

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Las Cruces is 0.2% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur.

0.2% more expensive

Las Cruces, NM is 0.2% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 90.0). A $100,000 salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur buys about the same as $100,184 in Las Cruces; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.0 (Beaumont-Port Arthur) vs 90.2 (Las Cruces)
  • $100k in Beaumont-Port Arthur ≈ $100,184 purchasing power in Las Cruces
  • Rents drives the gap (-8.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:NM 90.0→90.2

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × NM
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Beaumont-Port Arthur
90.0
Cost Index
Las Cruces
90.2
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX and Las Cruces, NM are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Las Cruces is 8.0 points lower. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Beaumont-Port Arthur corresponds to $100,184 in Las Cruces.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Beaumont-Port Arthur
90.0
Las Cruces
90.2
Goods
Beaumont-Port Arthur
93.8
Las Cruces
96.1
Services
Beaumont-Port Arthur
83.1
Las Cruces
77.9
Rents
Beaumont-Port Arthur
70.9
Las Cruces
63.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur would need to be in Las Cruces for the same purchasing power:

In Beaumont-Port Arthur In Las Cruces Difference
$50,000 $50,092 +$92
$75,000 $75,138 +$138
$100,000 $100,184 +$184
$150,000 $150,277 +$277
$ in Beaumont-Port Arthur = in Las Cruces

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.0 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Las Cruces more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur?

Las Cruces is 0.2% more expensive than Beaumont-Port Arthur. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 90.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Las Cruces equals $100K in Beaumont-Port Arthur?

A $100,000 salary in Beaumont-Port Arthur has the same purchasing power as $100,184 in Las Cruces. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Beaumont-Port Arthur and Las Cruces?

Rents in Beaumont-Port Arthur are indexed at 70.9 while Las Cruces is at 63.0 (national average = 100). Beaumont-Port Arthur has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.