Albany-Schenectady-Troy vs Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 3.5% more expensive than Albany-Schenectady-Troy.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY at an overall Regional Price Parity of 99.6 and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX at 103.1, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 3.5% more expensive than Albany-Schenectady-Troy on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 3.5 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Albany-Schenectady-Troy indexes goods at 99.7, services at 134.0, and rents at 102.6, while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington comes in at 102.8, 90.7, and 117.9 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Albany-Schenectady-Troy has the same purchasing power as $103,539 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 902,372 (Albany-Schenectady-Troy) and 7,807,555 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington), and median household incomes are $86,072 versus $87,155 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Albany-Schenectady-Troy
99.6
Cost Index
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Albany-Schenectady-Troy Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Difference
Overall 99.6 103.1 +3.5
Goods 99.7 102.8 +3.1
Services 134.0 90.7 -43.3
Rents 102.6 117.9 +15.3

Visual Comparison

Overall
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
99.6
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Goods
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
99.7
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Services
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
134.0
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Rents
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
102.6
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Albany-Schenectady-Troy would need to be in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for the same purchasing power:

In Albany-Schenectady-Troy In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Difference
$50,000 $51,770 +$1,770
$75,000 $77,655 +$2,655
$100,000 $103,539 +$3,539
$150,000 $155,309 +$5,309

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Albany-Schenectady-Troy Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Population 902,372 7,807,555
Median Income $86,072 $87,155
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington more expensive than Albany-Schenectady-Troy?
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 3.5% more expensive than Albany-Schenectady-Troy. The overall cost index is 103.1 vs 99.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington equals $100K in Albany-Schenectady-Troy?
A $100,000 salary in Albany-Schenectady-Troy has the same purchasing power as $103,539 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Albany-Schenectady-Troy and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?
Rents in Albany-Schenectady-Troy are indexed at 102.6 while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is at 117.9 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial