Overall
- Yuma
- 92.7
Diff +5.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 6% more expensive than Yuma.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 6% more expensive than Yuma, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Yuma buys about the same as $105,986 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:AZ 92.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +5.5 RPP
Diff 0.0 RPP
Diff +3.6 RPP
Diff +25.0 RPP
| Category | Yuma | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.7 | 98.3 | +5.5 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | 0.0 |
| Services | 87.8 | 91.5 | +3.6 |
| Rents | 73.8 | 98.8 | +25.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 25.0 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 6% more expensive than Yuma, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.5-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yuma corresponds to $105,986 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
What a salary in Yuma would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Yuma | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,993 | +$2,993 |
| $75,000 | $79,489 | +$4,489 |
| $100,000 | $105,986 | +$5,986 |
| $150,000 | $158,978 | +$8,978 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Yuma and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.6 to 5.5 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (34.9 to 25.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Yuma RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.4 | 103.0 | 10.6 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 93.8 | 96.5 | 2.7 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2016 | 92.7 | 98.6 | 5.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 88.7 | 93.2 | 4.5 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2024 | 92.7 | 98.3 | 5.5 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 6% more expensive than Yuma. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Yuma has the same purchasing power as $105,986 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Yuma are indexed at 73.8 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.