Yuma vs Binghamton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Binghamton is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma.

0.2% more expensive

Binghamton, NY is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Yuma buys about the same as $100,169 in Binghamton; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Yuma) vs 92.9 (Binghamton)
  • $100k in Yuma ≈ $100,169 purchasing power in Binghamton
  • Services drives the gap (+43.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:NY 92.7→92.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Yuma, AZ and Binghamton, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Binghamton is 43.7 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Yuma to $100,169 in Binghamton, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Yuma
92.7
Binghamton
92.9
Goods
Yuma
96.2
Binghamton
99.7
Services
Yuma
87.8
Binghamton
131.6
Rents
Yuma
73.8
Binghamton
69.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Yuma and Binghamton share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.6 to 0.2 RPP points. Binghamton remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (52.4 to 43.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Yuma RPP Binghamton RPP Relative Gap
2008 92.4 97.0 4.6 points Binghamton higher
2012 93.8 94.9 1.1 points Binghamton higher
2016 92.7 96.1 3.4 points Binghamton higher
2020 88.7 96.9 8.3 points Binghamton higher
2024 92.7 92.9 0.2 points Binghamton higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Yuma would need to be in Binghamton for the same purchasing power:

In Yuma In Binghamton Difference
$50,000 $50,085 +$85
$75,000 $75,127 +$127
$100,000 $100,169 +$169
$150,000 $150,254 +$254
$ in Yuma = – in Binghamton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Binghamton more expensive than Yuma?

Binghamton is 0.2% more expensive than Yuma. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Binghamton equals $100K in Yuma?

A $100,000 salary in Yuma has the same purchasing power as $100,169 in Binghamton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Yuma and Binghamton?

Rents in Yuma are indexed at 73.8 while Binghamton is at 69.7 (national average = 100). Yuma has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.