Overall
- Youngstown-Warren
- 87.4
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 87.1
Diff -0.3 RPP
Youngstown-Warren vs Waterloo-Cedar Falls
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.4% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren.
0.4% less expensive
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA is 0.4% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.1 vs 87.4). A $100,000 salary in Youngstown-Warren buys about the same as $99,614 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 87.4 (Youngstown-Warren) vs 87.1 (Waterloo-Cedar Falls)
- $100k in Youngstown-Warren ≈ $99,614 purchasing power in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- Services drives the gap (-12.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair OH:IA 87.4→87.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE OH × IA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Youngstown-Warren
87.4
Cost Index
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Youngstown-Warren, OH and Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 12.6 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Youngstown-Warren to $99,614 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Youngstown-Warren
- 93.6
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 93.7
Diff +0.1 RPP
Services
- Youngstown-Warren
- 96.3
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 83.7
Diff -12.6 RPP
Rents
- Youngstown-Warren
- 53.4
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 63.1
Diff +9.7 RPP
| Category | Youngstown-Warren | Waterloo-Cedar Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.4 | 87.1 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 93.7 | +0.1 |
| Services | 96.3 | 83.7 | -12.6 |
| Rents | 53.4 | 63.1 | +9.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Youngstown-Warren 87.4
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 87.1
Goods
Youngstown-Warren 93.6
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 93.7
Services
Youngstown-Warren 96.3
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 83.7
Rents
Youngstown-Warren 53.4
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 63.1
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Youngstown-Warren would need to be in Waterloo-Cedar Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Youngstown-Warren | In Waterloo-Cedar Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,807 | $-193 |
| $75,000 | $74,711 | $-289 |
| $100,000 | $99,614 | $-386 |
| $150,000 | $149,422 | $-578 |
$ in Youngstown-Warren = in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.4 → 87.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Waterloo-Cedar Falls more expensive than Youngstown-Warren?
Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.4% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren. The overall cost index is 87.1 vs 87.4 (national average = 100).
What salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls equals $100K in Youngstown-Warren?
A $100,000 salary in Youngstown-Warren has the same purchasing power as $99,614 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Youngstown-Warren and Waterloo-Cedar Falls?
Rents in Youngstown-Warren are indexed at 53.4 while Waterloo-Cedar Falls is at 63.1 (national average = 100). Waterloo-Cedar Falls has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.