Overall
- Youngstown-Warren
- 87.4
- Grand Island
- 86.7
Diff -0.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Grand Island is 0.8% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren.
Grand Island, NE is 0.8% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 86.7 vs 87.4). A $100,000 salary in Youngstown-Warren buys about the same as $99,157 in Grand Island; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OH:NE 87.4→86.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Youngstown-Warren, OH and Grand Island, NE are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.7 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Grand Island is 22.1 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Youngstown-Warren to $99,157 in Grand Island, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.7 RPP
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff -22.1 RPP
Diff +8.3 RPP
| Category | Youngstown-Warren | Grand Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.4 | 86.7 | -0.7 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 94.1 | +0.5 |
| Services | 96.3 | 74.2 | -22.1 |
| Rents | 53.4 | 61.7 | +8.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Youngstown-Warren and Grand Island share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 9.5 to 0.7 RPP points. Youngstown-Warren remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 20.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (20.4 to 0.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Youngstown-Warren RPP | Grand Island RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.3 | 81.8 | 9.5 points Youngstown-Warren higher |
| 2012 | 90.8 | 85.0 | 5.8 points Youngstown-Warren higher |
| 2016 | 87.8 | 87.7 | 0.1 points Youngstown-Warren higher |
| 2020 | 86.1 | 90.5 | 4.5 points Grand Island higher |
| 2024 | 87.4 | 86.7 | 0.7 points Youngstown-Warren higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Youngstown-Warren would need to be in Grand Island for the same purchasing power:
| In Youngstown-Warren | In Grand Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,578 | $-422 |
| $75,000 | $74,368 | $-632 |
| $100,000 | $99,157 | $-843 |
| $150,000 | $148,735 | $-1,265 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.4 → 86.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Grand Island is 0.8% less expensive than Youngstown-Warren. The overall cost index is 86.7 vs 87.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Youngstown-Warren has the same purchasing power as $99,157 in Grand Island. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Youngstown-Warren are indexed at 53.4 while Grand Island is at 61.7 (national average = 100). Grand Island has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.