Overall
- Yakima
- 95.5
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +8.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 8.5% more expensive than Yakima.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 8.5% more expensive than Yakima, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Yakima buys about the same as $108,504 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:WA 95.5→103.7
TIER-GAP · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +8.1 RPP
Diff 0.0 RPP
Diff -0.2 RPP
Diff +44.0 RPP
| Category | Yakima | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 103.7 | +8.1 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.0 | 0.0 |
| Services | 91.9 | 91.7 | -0.2 |
| Rents | 72.6 | 116.7 | +44.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 44.0 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Yakima, WA and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 8.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Yakima is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yakima corresponds to $108,504 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
What a salary in Yakima would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Yakima | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $54,252 | +$4,252 |
| $75,000 | $81,378 | +$6,378 |
| $100,000 | $108,504 | +$8,504 |
| $150,000 | $162,756 | +$12,756 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 8.5% more expensive than Yakima. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Yakima has the same purchasing power as $108,504 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Yakima are indexed at 72.6 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.