Overall
Diff +2.7 RPP
Yakima vs Lancaster
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 2.8% more expensive than Yakima.
2.8% more expensive
Lancaster, PA is 2.8% more expensive than Yakima, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Yakima buys about the same as $102,838 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 95.5 (Yakima) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
- $100k in Yakima ≈ $102,838 purchasing power in Lancaster
- Rents drives the gap (+21.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:PA 95.5→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE WA × PA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -4.3 RPP
Services
Diff +15.4 RPP
Rents
Diff +21.2 RPP
| Category | Yakima | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 98.3 | +2.7 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 100.7 | -4.3 |
| Services | 91.9 | 107.3 | +15.4 |
| Rents | 72.6 | 93.8 | +21.2 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Yakima 95.5
Lancaster 98.3
Goods
Yakima 105.0
Lancaster 100.7
Services
Yakima 91.9
Lancaster 107.3
Rents
Yakima 72.6
Lancaster 93.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Rents creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 21.2 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lancaster, PA is 2.8% more expensive than Yakima, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yakima corresponds to $102,838 in Lancaster.
Yakima
95.5
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Yakima would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Yakima | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,419 | +$1,419 |
| $75,000 | $77,129 | +$2,129 |
| $100,000 | $102,838 | +$2,838 |
| $150,000 | $154,258 | +$4,258 |
$ in Yakima = in Lancaster
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster more expensive than Yakima?
Lancaster is 2.8% more expensive than Yakima. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Yakima?
A $100,000 salary in Yakima has the same purchasing power as $102,838 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Yakima and Lancaster?
Rents in Yakima are indexed at 72.6 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.