Overall
Diff +0.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kankakee is 0.9% more expensive than Yakima.
Kankakee, IL is 0.9% more expensive than Yakima, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.4 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Yakima buys about the same as $100,889 in Kankakee; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:IL 95.5→96.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Yakima, WA and Kankakee, IL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Kankakee is 20.2 points higher. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yakima corresponds to $100,889 in Kankakee.
Diff +0.8 RPP
Diff -11.4 RPP
Diff -2.5 RPP
Diff +20.2 RPP
| Category | Yakima | Kankakee | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 96.4 | +0.8 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 93.6 | -11.4 |
| Services | 91.9 | 89.4 | -2.5 |
| Rents | 72.6 | 92.9 | +20.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Yakima and Kankakee share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.5 to 0.8 RPP points. Kankakee remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 27.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (25.1 to 2.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Yakima RPP | Kankakee RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 93.0 | 99.5 | 6.5 points Kankakee higher |
| 2012 | 97.1 | 99.2 | 2.1 points Kankakee higher |
| 2016 | 94.4 | 97.6 | 3.3 points Kankakee higher |
| 2020 | 96.2 | 90.6 | 5.6 points Yakima higher |
| 2024 | 95.5 | 96.4 | 0.8 points Kankakee higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Yakima would need to be in Kankakee for the same purchasing power:
| In Yakima | In Kankakee | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,444 | +$444 |
| $75,000 | $75,666 | +$666 |
| $100,000 | $100,889 | +$889 |
| $150,000 | $151,333 | +$1,333 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 96.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kankakee is 0.9% more expensive than Yakima. The overall cost index is 96.4 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Yakima has the same purchasing power as $100,889 in Kankakee. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Yakima are indexed at 72.6 while Kankakee is at 92.9 (national average = 100). Kankakee has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.