Overall
- Winston-Salem
- 92.0
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +6.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 6.8% more expensive than Winston-Salem.
Lancaster, PA is 6.8% more expensive than Winston-Salem, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.0). A $100,000 salary in Winston-Salem buys about the same as $106,751 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:PA 92.0→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Winston-Salem would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Winston-Salem | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,376 | +$3,376 |
| $75,000 | $80,063 | +$5,063 |
| $100,000 | $106,751 | +$6,751 |
| $150,000 | $160,127 | +$10,127 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.0 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 6.8% more expensive than Winston-Salem, NC, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.2-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Lancaster 22.4 points higher than Winston-Salem. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Winston-Salem corresponds to $106,751 in Lancaster.
Diff +6.2 RPP
Diff +4.1 RPP
Diff +18.8 RPP
Diff +22.4 RPP
| Category | Winston-Salem | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.0 | 98.3 | +6.2 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 100.7 | +4.1 |
| Services | 88.4 | 107.3 | +18.8 |
| Rents | 71.4 | 93.8 | +22.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Lancaster is 6.8% more expensive than Winston-Salem. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Winston-Salem has the same purchasing power as $106,751 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Winston-Salem are indexed at 71.4 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.