Overall
Diff -0.5 RPP
Wichita vs Goldsboro
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Goldsboro is 0.5% less expensive than Wichita.
0.5% less expensive
Goldsboro, NC is 0.5% less expensive than Wichita, KS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.5 vs 88.9). A $100,000 salary in Wichita buys about the same as $99,456 in Goldsboro; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 88.9 (Wichita) vs 88.5 (Goldsboro)
- $100k in Wichita ≈ $99,456 purchasing power in Goldsboro
- Rents drives the gap (-8.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair KS:NC 88.9→88.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE KS × NC
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Wichita
88.9
Cost Index
Goldsboro
88.5
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Wichita, KS and Goldsboro, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Goldsboro is 8.6 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Wichita corresponds to $99,456 in Goldsboro.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +2.6 RPP
Services
Diff -0.6 RPP
Rents
Diff -8.6 RPP
| Category | Wichita | Goldsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.9 | 88.5 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 94.0 | 96.6 | +2.6 |
| Services | 88.5 | 87.9 | -0.6 |
| Rents | 66.2 | 57.7 | -8.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Wichita 88.9
Goldsboro 88.5
Goods
Wichita 94.0
Goldsboro 96.6
Services
Wichita 88.5
Goldsboro 87.9
Rents
Wichita 66.2
Goldsboro 57.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Wichita would need to be in Goldsboro for the same purchasing power:
| In Wichita | In Goldsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,728 | $-272 |
| $75,000 | $74,592 | $-408 |
| $100,000 | $99,456 | $-544 |
| $150,000 | $149,184 | $-816 |
$ in Wichita = in Goldsboro
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.9 → 88.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Goldsboro more expensive than Wichita?
Goldsboro is 0.5% less expensive than Wichita. The overall cost index is 88.5 vs 88.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Goldsboro equals $100K in Wichita?
A $100,000 salary in Wichita has the same purchasing power as $99,456 in Goldsboro. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Wichita and Goldsboro?
Rents in Wichita are indexed at 66.2 while Goldsboro is at 57.7 (national average = 100). Wichita has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.