Wausau vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 11.8% more expensive than Wausau.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Wausau, WI at an overall Regional Price Parity of 92.7 and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN at 103.6, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 11.8% more expensive than Wausau on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 10.9 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Wausau indexes goods at 93.8, services at 90.0, and rents at 71.5, while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin comes in at 107.3, 83.6, and 112.0 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Chicago-Naperville-Elgin carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Wausau has the same purchasing power as $111,812 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 138,067 (Wausau) and 9,359,555 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin), and median household incomes are $76,185 versus $88,850 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Wausau
92.7
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Wausau Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
Overall 92.7 103.6 +10.9
Goods 93.8 107.3 +13.5
Services 90.0 83.6 -6.4
Rents 71.5 112.0 +40.5

Visual Comparison

Overall
Wausau
92.7
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Goods
Wausau
93.8
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Services
Wausau
90.0
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Rents
Wausau
71.5
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Wausau would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:

In Wausau In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
$50,000 $55,906 +$5,906
$75,000 $83,859 +$8,859
$100,000 $111,812 +$11,812
$150,000 $167,718 +$17,718

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Wausau Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Population 138,067 9,359,555
Median Income $76,185 $88,850
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than Wausau?
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 11.8% more expensive than Wausau. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in Wausau?
A $100,000 salary in Wausau has the same purchasing power as $111,812 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Wausau and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Rents in Wausau are indexed at 71.5 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-05-15. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.