Waterloo-Cedar Falls vs Brunswick-St. Simons

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Brunswick-St. Simons is 0.7% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls.

0.7% more expensive

Brunswick-St. Simons, GA is 0.7% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.7 vs 87.1). A $100,000 salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls buys about the same as $100,748 in Brunswick-St. Simons; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 87.1 (Waterloo-Cedar Falls) vs 87.7 (Brunswick-St. Simons)
  • $100k in Waterloo-Cedar Falls ≈ $100,748 purchasing power in Brunswick-St. Simons
  • Rents drives the gap (-6.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IA:GA 87.1→87.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IA × GA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Cost Index
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA and Brunswick-St. Simons, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.7 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Brunswick-St. Simons is 6.8 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls corresponds to $100,748 in Brunswick-St. Simons.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Goods
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
93.7
Brunswick-St. Simons
96.3
Services
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
83.7
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.3
Rents
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
63.1
Brunswick-St. Simons
56.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls would need to be in Brunswick-St. Simons for the same purchasing power:

In Waterloo-Cedar Falls In Brunswick-St. Simons Difference
$50,000 $50,374 +$374
$75,000 $75,561 +$561
$100,000 $100,748 +$748
$150,000 $151,122 +$1,122
$ in Waterloo-Cedar Falls = in Brunswick-St. Simons

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.1 → 87.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Brunswick-St. Simons more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls?

Brunswick-St. Simons is 0.7% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls. The overall cost index is 87.7 vs 87.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Brunswick-St. Simons equals $100K in Waterloo-Cedar Falls?

A $100,000 salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls has the same purchasing power as $100,748 in Brunswick-St. Simons. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Waterloo-Cedar Falls and Brunswick-St. Simons?

Rents in Waterloo-Cedar Falls are indexed at 63.1 while Brunswick-St. Simons is at 56.3 (national average = 100). Waterloo-Cedar Falls has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.