Overall
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 87.1
- Boise City
- 98.4
Diff +11.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boise City is 13% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls.
Boise City, ID is 13% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.4 vs 87.1). A $100,000 salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls buys about the same as $113,019 in Boise City; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair IA:ID 87.1→98.4
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +11.3 RPP
Diff +2.4 RPP
Diff -13.0 RPP
Diff +42.4 RPP
| Category | Waterloo-Cedar Falls | Boise City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.1 | 98.4 | +11.3 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.2 | +2.4 |
| Services | 83.7 | 70.7 | -13.0 |
| Rents | 63.1 | 105.6 | +42.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Boise City is 42.4 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA and Boise City, ID sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 11.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls corresponds to $113,019 in Boise City.
What a salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls would need to be in Boise City for the same purchasing power:
| In Waterloo-Cedar Falls | In Boise City | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $56,510 | +$6,510 |
| $75,000 | $84,764 | +$9,764 |
| $100,000 | $113,019 | +$13,019 |
| $150,000 | $169,529 | +$19,529 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.1 → 98.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Boise City is 13% more expensive than Waterloo-Cedar Falls. The overall cost index is 98.4 vs 87.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls has the same purchasing power as $113,019 in Boise City. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Waterloo-Cedar Falls are indexed at 63.1 while Boise City is at 105.6 (national average = 100). Boise City has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.