Overall
- Warner Robins
- 93.8
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 0.3% more expensive than Warner Robins.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ is 0.3% more expensive than Warner Robins, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.1 vs 93.8). A $100,000 salary in Warner Robins buys about the same as $100,329 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair GA:AZ 93.8→94.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Warner Robins, GA and Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 0.6 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Warner Robins corresponds to $100,329 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff -0.0 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
| Category | Warner Robins | Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.8 | 94.1 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.2 | -0.0 |
| Services | 88.1 | 88.7 | +0.6 |
| Rents | 79.2 | 79.8 | +0.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Warner Robins and Lake Havasu City-Kingman share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.7 to 0.3 RPP points. Lake Havasu City-Kingman remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 12.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (13.5 to 0.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Warner Robins RPP | Lake Havasu City-Kingman RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.1 | 93.8 | 1.7 points Lake Havasu City-Kingman higher |
| 2012 | 94.3 | 95.5 | 1.2 points Lake Havasu City-Kingman higher |
| 2016 | 93.0 | 93.0 | 0.0 points Warner Robins higher |
| 2020 | 92.0 | 87.7 | 4.3 points Warner Robins higher |
| 2024 | 93.8 | 94.1 | 0.3 points Lake Havasu City-Kingman higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Warner Robins would need to be in Lake Havasu City-Kingman for the same purchasing power:
| In Warner Robins | In Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,165 | +$165 |
| $75,000 | $75,247 | +$247 |
| $100,000 | $100,329 | +$329 |
| $150,000 | $150,494 | +$494 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.8 → 94.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 0.3% more expensive than Warner Robins. The overall cost index is 94.1 vs 93.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Warner Robins has the same purchasing power as $100,329 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Warner Robins are indexed at 79.2 while Lake Havasu City-Kingman is at 79.8 (national average = 100). Lake Havasu City-Kingman has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.