Overall
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff -4.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 4.5% less expensive than Walla Walla.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ is 4.5% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.1 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $95,513 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman; the largest component gap is goods.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:AZ 98.5→94.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Walla Walla and Lake Havasu City-Kingman share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.8 to 4.4 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 29.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (23.4 to 5.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Walla Walla RPP | Lake Havasu City-Kingman RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.6 | 93.8 | 1.8 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2012 | 95.1 | 95.5 | 0.4 points Lake Havasu City-Kingman higher |
| 2016 | 96.3 | 93.0 | 3.3 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2020 | 95.2 | 87.7 | 7.5 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2024 | 98.5 | 94.1 | 4.4 points Walla Walla higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ is 4.5% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.4-point overall gap.
Goods leads the difference, with Lake Havasu City-Kingman 8.8 points lower than Walla Walla. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $95,513 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Walla Walla, then replace the national basket with your own.
What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Lake Havasu City-Kingman for the same purchasing power:
| In Walla Walla | In Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,756 | $-2,244 |
| $75,000 | $71,634 | $-3,366 |
| $100,000 | $95,513 | $-4,487 |
| $150,000 | $143,269 | $-6,731 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 94.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Diff -4.4 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff -5.6 RPP
Diff -6.8 RPP
| Category | Walla Walla | Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.5 | 94.1 | -4.4 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 94.3 | 88.7 | -5.6 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 79.8 | -6.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Lake Havasu City-Kingman is 4.5% less expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 94.1 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $95,513 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Lake Havasu City-Kingman is at 79.8 (national average = 100). Walla Walla has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.