Overall
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
- Durham-Chapel Hill
- 97.6
Diff -0.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Durham-Chapel Hill is 1% less expensive than Walla Walla.
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC is 1% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.6 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $99,039 in Durham-Chapel Hill; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:NC 98.5→97.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Walla Walla, WA and Durham-Chapel Hill, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Durham-Chapel Hill is 12.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Walla Walla corresponds to $99,039 in Durham-Chapel Hill.
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff -8.4 RPP
Diff -5.0 RPP
Diff +12.4 RPP
| Category | Walla Walla | Durham-Chapel Hill | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.5 | 97.6 | -0.9 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.6 | -8.4 |
| Services | 94.3 | 89.3 | -5.0 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 98.9 | +12.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Walla Walla and Durham-Chapel Hill share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.7 to 0.9 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 25.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (20.7 to 5.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Walla Walla RPP | Durham-Chapel Hill RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.6 | 97.3 | 1.7 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2012 | 95.1 | 96.7 | 1.5 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2016 | 96.3 | 97.5 | 1.2 points Durham-Chapel Hill higher |
| 2020 | 95.2 | 94.8 | 0.3 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2024 | 98.5 | 97.6 | 0.9 points Walla Walla higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Durham-Chapel Hill for the same purchasing power:
| In Walla Walla | In Durham-Chapel Hill | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,519 | $-481 |
| $75,000 | $74,279 | $-721 |
| $100,000 | $99,039 | $-961 |
| $150,000 | $148,558 | $-1,442 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 97.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Durham-Chapel Hill is 1% less expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 97.6 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $99,039 in Durham-Chapel Hill. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Durham-Chapel Hill is at 98.9 (national average = 100). Durham-Chapel Hill has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.