Overall
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff -1.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is 1.2% less expensive than Walla Walla.
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC is 1.2% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.3 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $98,811 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:NC 98.5→97.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Walla Walla, WA and Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is 11.1 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Walla Walla corresponds to $98,811 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia.
Diff -1.2 RPP
Diff -8.4 RPP
Diff -5.1 RPP
Diff +11.1 RPP
| Category | Walla Walla | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.5 | 97.3 | -1.2 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.6 | -8.4 |
| Services | 94.3 | 89.2 | -5.1 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 97.6 | +11.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Walla Walla and Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.3 to 1.2 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 25.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (20.3 to 5.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Walla Walla RPP | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.6 | 95.3 | 0.3 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2012 | 95.1 | 96.1 | 1.0 points Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia higher |
| 2016 | 96.3 | 96.9 | 0.6 points Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia higher |
| 2020 | 95.2 | 94.2 | 1.0 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2024 | 98.5 | 97.3 | 1.2 points Walla Walla higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia for the same purchasing power:
| In Walla Walla | In Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,406 | $-594 |
| $75,000 | $74,109 | $-891 |
| $100,000 | $98,811 | $-1,189 |
| $150,000 | $148,217 | $-1,783 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 97.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is 1.2% less expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 97.3 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $98,811 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is at 97.6 (national average = 100). Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.