Overall
- Tucson
- 96.9
Diff +1.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 1.4% more expensive than Tucson.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 1.4% more expensive than Tucson, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 96.9). A $100,000 salary in Tucson buys about the same as $101,403 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:AZ 96.9→98.3
PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tucson, AZ and Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 7.0 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Tucson corresponds to $101,403 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Diff +1.4 RPP
Diff 0.0 RPP
Diff +1.9 RPP
Diff +7.0 RPP
| Category | Tucson | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.9 | 98.3 | +1.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | 0.0 |
| Services | 89.5 | 91.5 | +1.9 |
| Rents | 91.8 | 98.8 | +7.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Tucson and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.9 to 1.4 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 6.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (4.8 to 1.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Tucson RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.1 | 103.0 | 5.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 100.6 | 96.5 | 4.0 points Tucson higher |
| 2016 | 96.6 | 98.6 | 2.0 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 94.0 | 93.2 | 0.8 points Tucson higher |
| 2024 | 96.9 | 98.3 | 1.4 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Tucson would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Tucson | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,701 | +$701 |
| $75,000 | $76,052 | +$1,052 |
| $100,000 | $101,403 | +$1,403 |
| $150,000 | $152,104 | +$2,104 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 1.4% more expensive than Tucson. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 96.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Tucson has the same purchasing power as $101,403 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Tucson are indexed at 91.8 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.