Overall
Diff -0.4 RPP
Tucson vs Cheyenne
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cheyenne is 0.4% less expensive than Tucson.
0.4% less expensive
Cheyenne, WY is 0.4% less expensive than Tucson, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 96.9). A $100,000 salary in Tucson buys about the same as $99,582 in Cheyenne; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 96.9 (Tucson) vs 96.5 (Cheyenne)
- $100k in Tucson ≈ $99,582 purchasing power in Cheyenne
- Services drives the gap (-11.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WY 96.9→96.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE AZ × WY
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tucson
96.9
Cost Index
Cheyenne
96.5
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Tucson, AZ and Cheyenne, WY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Cheyenne 11.6 points lower than Tucson. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Tucson to $99,582 in Cheyenne, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -0.9 RPP
Services
Diff -11.6 RPP
Rents
Diff -1.9 RPP
| Category | Tucson | Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.9 | 96.5 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 95.4 | -0.9 |
| Services | 89.5 | 78.0 | -11.6 |
| Rents | 91.8 | 89.8 | -1.9 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Tucson 96.9
Cheyenne 96.5
Goods
Tucson 96.2
Cheyenne 95.4
Services
Tucson 89.5
Cheyenne 78.0
Rents
Tucson 91.8
Cheyenne 89.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Tucson would need to be in Cheyenne for the same purchasing power:
| In Tucson | In Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,791 | $-209 |
| $75,000 | $74,687 | $-313 |
| $100,000 | $99,582 | $-418 |
| $150,000 | $149,373 | $-627 |
$ in Tucson = in Cheyenne
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.9 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cheyenne more expensive than Tucson?
Cheyenne is 0.4% less expensive than Tucson. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 96.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Cheyenne equals $100K in Tucson?
A $100,000 salary in Tucson has the same purchasing power as $99,582 in Cheyenne. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Tucson and Cheyenne?
Rents in Tucson are indexed at 91.8 while Cheyenne is at 89.8 (national average = 100). Tucson has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.