Overall
Diff +1.6 RPP
Texarkana vs Gadsden
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Gadsden is 2% more expensive than Texarkana.
2% more expensive
Gadsden, AL is 2% more expensive than Texarkana, TX-AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.7 vs 84.0). A $100,000 salary in Texarkana buys about the same as $101,953 in Gadsden; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 84.0 (Texarkana) vs 85.7 (Gadsden)
- $100k in Texarkana ≈ $101,953 purchasing power in Gadsden
- Services drives the gap (+7.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:AL 84.0→85.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TX × AL
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Texarkana
84.0
Cost Index
Gadsden
85.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Texarkana, TX-AR and Gadsden, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Gadsden 7.5 points higher than Texarkana. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Texarkana to $101,953 in Gadsden, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +2.7 RPP
Services
Diff +7.5 RPP
Rents
Diff +3.8 RPP
| Category | Texarkana | Gadsden | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 84.0 | 85.7 | +1.6 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.4 | +2.7 |
| Services | 79.3 | 86.7 | +7.5 |
| Rents | 49.9 | 53.7 | +3.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Texarkana 84.0
Gadsden 85.7
Goods
Texarkana 93.7
Gadsden 96.4
Services
Texarkana 79.3
Gadsden 86.7
Rents
Texarkana 49.9
Gadsden 53.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Texarkana would need to be in Gadsden for the same purchasing power:
| In Texarkana | In Gadsden | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,977 | +$977 |
| $75,000 | $76,465 | +$1,465 |
| $100,000 | $101,953 | +$1,953 |
| $150,000 | $152,930 | +$2,930 |
$ in Texarkana = in Gadsden
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (84.0 → 85.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gadsden more expensive than Texarkana?
Gadsden is 2% more expensive than Texarkana. The overall cost index is 85.7 vs 84.0 (national average = 100).
What salary in Gadsden equals $100K in Texarkana?
A $100,000 salary in Texarkana has the same purchasing power as $101,953 in Gadsden. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Texarkana and Gadsden?
Rents in Texarkana are indexed at 49.9 while Gadsden is at 53.7 (national average = 100). Gadsden has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.