Overall
- Sumter
- 88.0
- Hattiesburg
- 87.6
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Hattiesburg is 0.4% less expensive than Sumter.
Hattiesburg, MS is 0.4% less expensive than Sumter, SC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.6 vs 88.0). A $100,000 salary in Sumter buys about the same as $99,560 in Hattiesburg; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair SC:MS 88.0→87.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Sumter, SC and Hattiesburg, MS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Hattiesburg 10.4 points lower than Sumter. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Sumter to $99,560 in Hattiesburg, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -10.4 RPP
Diff -0.8 RPP
| Category | Sumter | Hattiesburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.0 | 87.6 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.2 | -0.1 |
| Services | 87.3 | 76.9 | -10.4 |
| Rents | 60.8 | 60.1 | -0.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Sumter and Hattiesburg share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.5 to 0.4 RPP points. Sumter remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.8 to 0.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Sumter RPP | Hattiesburg RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.4 | 89.9 | 0.5 points Hattiesburg higher |
| 2012 | 89.6 | 89.6 | 0.1 points Hattiesburg higher |
| 2016 | 87.1 | 88.5 | 1.4 points Hattiesburg higher |
| 2020 | 81.4 | 85.3 | 3.9 points Hattiesburg higher |
| 2024 | 88.0 | 87.6 | 0.4 points Sumter higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Sumter would need to be in Hattiesburg for the same purchasing power:
| In Sumter | In Hattiesburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,780 | $-220 |
| $75,000 | $74,670 | $-330 |
| $100,000 | $99,560 | $-440 |
| $150,000 | $149,340 | $-660 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.0 → 87.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Hattiesburg is 0.4% less expensive than Sumter. The overall cost index is 87.6 vs 88.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Sumter has the same purchasing power as $99,560 in Hattiesburg. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Sumter are indexed at 60.8 while Hattiesburg is at 60.1 (national average = 100). Sumter has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.