Overall
- Sumter
- 88.0
- Fairbanks-College
- 103.2
Diff +15.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fairbanks-College is 17.3% more expensive than Sumter.
Fairbanks-College, AK is 17.3% more expensive than Sumter, SC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.2 vs 88.0). A $100,000 salary in Sumter buys about the same as $117,255 in Fairbanks-College; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair SC:AK 88.0→103.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Sumter, SC and Fairbanks-College, AK sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 15.2 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Fairbanks-College is above 100 while Sumter is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Fairbanks-College 32.5 points higher than Sumter. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Sumter to $117,255 in Fairbanks-College, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Sumter and Fairbanks-College share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 15.3 to 15.2 RPP points. Fairbanks-College remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 29.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (61.3 to 31.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Sumter RPP | Fairbanks-College RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.4 | 104.7 | 15.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2012 | 89.6 | 97.9 | 8.4 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2016 | 87.1 | 100.4 | 13.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2020 | 81.4 | 99.4 | 18.0 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2024 | 88.0 | 103.2 | 15.2 points Fairbanks-College higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +15.2 RPP
Diff +11.0 RPP
Diff +32.5 RPP
Diff +31.7 RPP
| Category | Sumter | Fairbanks-College | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.0 | 103.2 | +15.2 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 107.3 | +11.0 |
| Services | 87.3 | 119.8 | +32.5 |
| Rents | 60.8 | 92.6 | +31.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Sumter would need to be in Fairbanks-College for the same purchasing power:
| In Sumter | In Fairbanks-College | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $58,628 | +$8,628 |
| $75,000 | $87,941 | +$12,941 |
| $100,000 | $117,255 | +$17,255 |
| $150,000 | $175,883 | +$25,883 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.0 → 103.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fairbanks-College is 17.3% more expensive than Sumter. The overall cost index is 103.2 vs 88.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Sumter has the same purchasing power as $117,255 in Fairbanks-College. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Sumter are indexed at 60.8 while Fairbanks-College is at 92.6 (national average = 100). Fairbanks-College has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.