Overall
- Stockton-Lodi
- 105.1
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff -6.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 6.5% less expensive than Stockton-Lodi.
Lancaster, PA is 6.5% less expensive than Stockton-Lodi, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 105.1). A $100,000 salary in Stockton-Lodi buys about the same as $93,499 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:PA 105.1→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Lancaster, PA is 6.5% less expensive than Stockton-Lodi, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Stockton-Lodi is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 51.0 points lower than Stockton-Lodi. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Stockton-Lodi to $93,499 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Stockton-Lodi and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.0 to 6.8 RPP points. Stockton-Lodi remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 60.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.7 to 51.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Stockton-Lodi RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 100.2 | 100.2 | 0.0 points Stockton-Lodi higher |
| 2012 | 103.8 | 97.8 | 6.0 points Stockton-Lodi higher |
| 2016 | 99.9 | 99.4 | 0.5 points Stockton-Lodi higher |
| 2020 | 105.3 | 97.9 | 7.4 points Stockton-Lodi higher |
| 2024 | 105.1 | 98.3 | 6.8 points Stockton-Lodi higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -6.8 RPP
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff -51.0 RPP
Diff -21.8 RPP
| Category | Stockton-Lodi | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 105.1 | 98.3 | -6.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 100.7 | -4.5 |
| Services | 158.2 | 107.3 | -51.0 |
| Rents | 115.6 | 93.8 | -21.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Stockton-Lodi would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Stockton-Lodi | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,749 | $-3,251 |
| $75,000 | $70,124 | $-4,876 |
| $100,000 | $93,499 | $-6,501 |
| $150,000 | $140,248 | $-9,752 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (105.1 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 6.5% less expensive than Stockton-Lodi. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 105.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Stockton-Lodi has the same purchasing power as $93,499 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Stockton-Lodi are indexed at 115.6 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Stockton-Lodi has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.