Overall
- St. Louis
- 95.1
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
Diff +0.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 0% more expensive than St. Louis.
Pittsfield, MA is 0% more expensive than St. Louis, MO-IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in St. Louis buys about the same as $100,019 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MO:MA 95.1→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
St. Louis, MO-IL and Pittsfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 83.8 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in St. Louis to $100,019 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff -3.0 RPP
Diff +83.8 RPP
Diff -5.6 RPP
| Category | St. Louis | Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.1 | 95.1 | +0.0 |
| Goods | 100.0 | 97.0 | -3.0 |
| Services | 69.9 | 153.7 | +83.8 |
| Rents | 79.0 | 73.5 | -5.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
St. Louis and Pittsfield share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.6 to 0.0 RPP points. Pittsfield remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (61.2 to 83.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | St. Louis RPP | Pittsfield RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.0 | 99.6 | 8.6 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2012 | 94.5 | 97.8 | 3.3 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2016 | 94.5 | 100.5 | 6.0 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2020 | 95.2 | 99.5 | 4.3 points Pittsfield higher |
| 2024 | 95.1 | 95.1 | 0.0 points Pittsfield higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in St. Louis would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:
| In St. Louis | In Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,009 | +$9 |
| $75,000 | $75,014 | +$14 |
| $100,000 | $100,019 | +$19 |
| $150,000 | $150,028 | +$28 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pittsfield is 0% more expensive than St. Louis. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in St. Louis has the same purchasing power as $100,019 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in St. Louis are indexed at 79.0 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). St. Louis has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.