Overall
- Springfield
- 96.1
- Salisbury
- 95.6
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Salisbury is 0.5% less expensive than Springfield.
Salisbury, MD is 0.5% less expensive than Springfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.6 vs 96.1). A $100,000 salary in Springfield buys about the same as $99,538 in Salisbury; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:MD 96.1→95.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Springfield, MA and Salisbury, MD are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Salisbury is 52.2 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Springfield to $99,538 in Salisbury, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff -52.2 RPP
Diff +11.4 RPP
| Category | Springfield | Salisbury | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.1 | 95.6 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 96.6 | -0.4 |
| Services | 155.0 | 102.8 | -52.2 |
| Rents | 75.8 | 87.2 | +11.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Springfield would need to be in Salisbury for the same purchasing power:
| In Springfield | In Salisbury | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,769 | $-231 |
| $75,000 | $74,653 | $-347 |
| $100,000 | $99,538 | $-462 |
| $150,000 | $149,307 | $-693 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.1 → 95.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Salisbury is 0.5% less expensive than Springfield. The overall cost index is 95.6 vs 96.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Springfield has the same purchasing power as $99,538 in Salisbury. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Springfield are indexed at 75.8 while Salisbury is at 87.2 (national average = 100). Salisbury has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.