Springfield vs Flint

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Flint is 0.3% more expensive than Springfield.

0.3% more expensive

Flint, MI is 0.3% more expensive than Springfield, IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.0 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Springfield buys about the same as $100,312 in Flint; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Springfield) vs 93.0 (Flint)
  • $100k in Springfield ≈ $100,312 purchasing power in Flint
  • Services drives the gap (+6.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:MI 92.7→93.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IL × MI
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Springfield
92.7
Cost Index
Flint
93.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Springfield, IL and Flint, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with Flint 6.7 points higher than Springfield. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Springfield to $100,312 in Flint, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Springfield
92.7
Flint
93.0
Goods
Springfield
93.6
Flint
93.7
Services
Springfield
90.4
Flint
97.1
Rents
Springfield
71.6
Flint
74.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Springfield would need to be in Flint for the same purchasing power:

In Springfield In Flint Difference
$50,000 $50,156 +$156
$75,000 $75,234 +$234
$100,000 $100,312 +$312
$150,000 $150,467 +$467
$ in Springfield = in Flint

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 93.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Flint more expensive than Springfield?

Flint is 0.3% more expensive than Springfield. The overall cost index is 93.0 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Flint equals $100K in Springfield?

A $100,000 salary in Springfield has the same purchasing power as $100,312 in Flint. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Springfield and Flint?

Rents in Springfield are indexed at 71.6 while Flint is at 74.0 (national average = 100). Flint has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.