Overall
- Spartanburg
- 91.1
- Fargo
- 90.9
Diff -0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fargo is 0.2% less expensive than Spartanburg.
Fargo, ND-MN is 0.2% less expensive than Spartanburg, SC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Spartanburg buys about the same as $99,802 in Fargo; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair SC:ND 91.1→90.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Spartanburg, SC and Fargo, ND-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Fargo is 13.1 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Spartanburg corresponds to $99,802 in Fargo.
Diff -0.2 RPP
Diff -0.7 RPP
Diff -11.0 RPP
Diff +13.1 RPP
| Category | Spartanburg | Fargo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 90.9 | -0.2 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 95.7 | -0.7 |
| Services | 88.3 | 77.3 | -11.0 |
| Rents | 68.0 | 81.1 | +13.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Spartanburg and Fargo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.6 to 0.2 RPP points. Spartanburg remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (18.6 to 13.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Spartanburg RPP | Fargo RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.7 | 97.3 | 5.6 points Fargo higher |
| 2012 | 92.2 | 95.9 | 3.8 points Fargo higher |
| 2016 | 93.3 | 95.4 | 2.1 points Fargo higher |
| 2020 | 88.9 | 92.5 | 3.6 points Fargo higher |
| 2024 | 91.1 | 90.9 | 0.2 points Spartanburg higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Spartanburg would need to be in Fargo for the same purchasing power:
| In Spartanburg | In Fargo | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,901 | $-99 |
| $75,000 | $74,852 | $-148 |
| $100,000 | $99,802 | $-198 |
| $150,000 | $149,703 | $-297 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fargo is 0.2% less expensive than Spartanburg. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Spartanburg has the same purchasing power as $99,802 in Fargo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Spartanburg are indexed at 68.0 while Fargo is at 81.1 (national average = 100). Fargo has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.