Overall
- Spartanburg
- 91.1
- Birmingham
- 91.6
Diff +0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Birmingham is 0.7% more expensive than Spartanburg.
Birmingham, AL is 0.7% more expensive than Spartanburg, SC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.6 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Spartanburg buys about the same as $100,651 in Birmingham; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair SC:AL 91.1→91.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Spartanburg, SC and Birmingham, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Birmingham is 4.5 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Spartanburg to $100,651 in Birmingham, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff +3.8 RPP
| Category | Spartanburg | Birmingham | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 91.6 | +0.6 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.4 | +0.1 |
| Services | 88.3 | 83.8 | -4.5 |
| Rents | 68.0 | 71.9 | +3.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Spartanburg would need to be in Birmingham for the same purchasing power:
| In Spartanburg | In Birmingham | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,326 | +$326 |
| $75,000 | $75,488 | +$488 |
| $100,000 | $100,651 | +$651 |
| $150,000 | $150,977 | +$977 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 91.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Birmingham is 0.7% more expensive than Spartanburg. The overall cost index is 91.6 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Spartanburg has the same purchasing power as $100,651 in Birmingham. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Spartanburg are indexed at 68.0 while Birmingham is at 71.9 (national average = 100). Birmingham has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.