Shreveport-Bossier City vs McAllen-Edinburg-Mission

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is 1.3% more expensive than Shreveport-Bossier City.

1.3% more expensive

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX is 1.3% more expensive than Shreveport-Bossier City, LA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 84.8). A $100,000 salary in Shreveport-Bossier City buys about the same as $101,332 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 84.8 (Shreveport-Bossier City) vs 85.9 (McAllen-Edinburg-Mission)
  • $100k in Shreveport-Bossier City ≈ $101,332 purchasing power in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
  • Services drives the gap (+8.6 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair LA:TX 84.8→85.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE LA × TX
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Shreveport-Bossier City
84.8
Cost Index
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Shreveport-Bossier City, LA and McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with McAllen-Edinburg-Mission 8.6 points higher than Shreveport-Bossier City. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Shreveport-Bossier City to $101,332 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Shreveport-Bossier City
84.8
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Goods
Shreveport-Bossier City
93.7
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
93.8
Services
Shreveport-Bossier City
72.6
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
81.2
Rents
Shreveport-Bossier City
52.3
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
55.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Shreveport-Bossier City would need to be in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission for the same purchasing power:

In Shreveport-Bossier City In McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Difference
$50,000 $50,666 +$666
$75,000 $75,999 +$999
$100,000 $101,332 +$1,332
$150,000 $151,998 +$1,998
$ in Shreveport-Bossier City = in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (84.8 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is McAllen-Edinburg-Mission more expensive than Shreveport-Bossier City?

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is 1.3% more expensive than Shreveport-Bossier City. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 84.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission equals $100K in Shreveport-Bossier City?

A $100,000 salary in Shreveport-Bossier City has the same purchasing power as $101,332 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Shreveport-Bossier City and McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

Rents in Shreveport-Bossier City are indexed at 52.3 while McAllen-Edinburg-Mission is at 55.9 (national average = 100). McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.