Scranton--Wilkes-Barre vs Warner Robins

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Warner Robins is 0.2% more expensive than Scranton--Wilkes-Barre.

0.2% more expensive

Warner Robins, GA is 0.2% more expensive than Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.8 vs 93.6). A $100,000 salary in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre buys about the same as $100,249 in Warner Robins; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 93.6 (Scranton--Wilkes-Barre) vs 93.8 (Warner Robins)
  • $100k in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre ≈ $100,249 purchasing power in Warner Robins
  • Services drives the gap (-18.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair PA:GA 93.6→93.8

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE PA × GA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre
93.6
Cost Index
Warner Robins
93.8
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA and Warner Robins, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Warner Robins is 18.4 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre to $100,249 in Warner Robins, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre
93.6
Warner Robins
93.8
Goods
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre
100.7
Warner Robins
96.3
Services
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre
106.5
Warner Robins
88.1
Rents
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre
67.0
Warner Robins
79.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre would need to be in Warner Robins for the same purchasing power:

In Scranton--Wilkes-Barre In Warner Robins Difference
$50,000 $50,125 +$125
$75,000 $75,187 +$187
$100,000 $100,249 +$249
$150,000 $150,374 +$374
$ in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre = in Warner Robins

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.6 → 93.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Warner Robins more expensive than Scranton--Wilkes-Barre?

Warner Robins is 0.2% more expensive than Scranton--Wilkes-Barre. The overall cost index is 93.8 vs 93.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Warner Robins equals $100K in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre?

A $100,000 salary in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre has the same purchasing power as $100,249 in Warner Robins. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Scranton--Wilkes-Barre and Warner Robins?

Rents in Scranton--Wilkes-Barre are indexed at 67.0 while Warner Robins is at 79.2 (national average = 100). Warner Robins has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.