Santa Fe vs Kingston

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kingston is 2% more expensive than Santa Fe.

2% more expensive

Kingston, NY is 2% more expensive than Santa Fe, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.7 vs 98.8). A $100,000 salary in Santa Fe buys about the same as $101,966 in Kingston; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 98.8 (Santa Fe) vs 100.7 (Kingston)
  • $100k in Santa Fe ≈ $101,966 purchasing power in Kingston
  • Services drives the gap (+56.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NM:NY 98.8→100.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NM × NY
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Santa Fe
98.8
Cost Index
Kingston
100.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Santa Fe, NM and Kingston, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with Kingston 56.9 points higher than Santa Fe. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Kingston is above 100 while Santa Fe is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Santa Fe to $101,966 in Kingston, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Santa Fe
98.8
Kingston
100.7
Goods
Santa Fe
96.1
Kingston
99.7
Services
Santa Fe
76.7
Kingston
133.6
Rents
Santa Fe
108.0
Kingston
110.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Santa Fe and Kingston share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 9.1 to 1.9 RPP points. Kingston remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 33.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.9 to 2.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Santa Fe RPP Kingston RPP Relative Gap
2008 98.0 107.1 9.1 points Kingston higher
2012 102.1 102.0 0.1 points Santa Fe higher
2016 98.4 101.2 2.7 points Kingston higher
2020 96.6 101.6 5.0 points Kingston higher
2024 98.8 100.7 1.9 points Kingston higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Santa Fe would need to be in Kingston for the same purchasing power:

In Santa Fe In Kingston Difference
$50,000 $50,983 +$983
$75,000 $76,475 +$1,475
$100,000 $101,966 +$1,966
$150,000 $152,949 +$2,949
$ in Santa Fe = in Kingston

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.8 → 100.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kingston more expensive than Santa Fe?

Kingston is 2% more expensive than Santa Fe. The overall cost index is 100.7 vs 98.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Kingston equals $100K in Santa Fe?

A $100,000 salary in Santa Fe has the same purchasing power as $101,966 in Kingston. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Santa Fe and Kingston?

Rents in Santa Fe are indexed at 108.0 while Kingston is at 110.2 (national average = 100). Kingston has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.