San Antonio-New Braunfels vs Pittsfield

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 0.4% more expensive than San Antonio-New Braunfels.

0.4% more expensive

Pittsfield, MA is 0.4% more expensive than San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in San Antonio-New Braunfels buys about the same as $100,412 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 94.7 (San Antonio-New Braunfels) vs 95.1 (Pittsfield)
  • $100k in San Antonio-New Braunfels ≈ $100,412 purchasing power in Pittsfield
  • Services drives the gap (+71.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:MA 94.7→95.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × MA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.7
Cost Index
Pittsfield
95.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX and Pittsfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 71.5 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in San Antonio-New Braunfels to $100,412 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.7
Pittsfield
95.1
Goods
San Antonio-New Braunfels
93.8
Pittsfield
97.0
Services
San Antonio-New Braunfels
82.2
Pittsfield
153.7
Rents
San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.6
Pittsfield
73.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in San Antonio-New Braunfels would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:

In San Antonio-New Braunfels In Pittsfield Difference
$50,000 $50,206 +$206
$75,000 $75,309 +$309
$100,000 $100,412 +$412
$150,000 $150,618 +$618
$ in San Antonio-New Braunfels = in Pittsfield

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pittsfield more expensive than San Antonio-New Braunfels?

Pittsfield is 0.4% more expensive than San Antonio-New Braunfels. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Pittsfield equals $100K in San Antonio-New Braunfels?

A $100,000 salary in San Antonio-New Braunfels has the same purchasing power as $100,412 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between San Antonio-New Braunfels and Pittsfield?

Rents in San Antonio-New Braunfels are indexed at 94.6 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). San Antonio-New Braunfels has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.