San Angelo vs Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 0.3% more expensive than San Angelo.

0.3% more expensive

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH is 0.3% more expensive than San Angelo, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.5). A $100,000 salary in San Angelo buys about the same as $100,261 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.5 (San Angelo) vs 92.7 (Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek)
  • $100k in San Angelo ≈ $100,261 purchasing power in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
  • Services drives the gap (+13.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:OH 92.5→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × OH
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

San Angelo
92.5
Cost Index
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

San Angelo, TX and Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 13.8 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in San Angelo to $100,261 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
San Angelo
92.5
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Goods
San Angelo
93.8
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
93.6
Services
San Angelo
81.6
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
95.4
Rents
San Angelo
81.4
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
72.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in San Angelo would need to be in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek for the same purchasing power:

In San Angelo In Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek Difference
$50,000 $50,130 +$130
$75,000 $75,196 +$196
$100,000 $100,261 +$261
$150,000 $150,391 +$391
$ in San Angelo = in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.5 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek more expensive than San Angelo?

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 0.3% more expensive than San Angelo. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek equals $100K in San Angelo?

A $100,000 salary in San Angelo has the same purchasing power as $100,261 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between San Angelo and Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek?

Rents in San Angelo are indexed at 81.4 while Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is at 72.7 (national average = 100). San Angelo has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.