Overall
- Salem
- 103.6
- Buffalo-Cheektowaga
- 95.8
Diff -7.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 7.5% less expensive than Salem.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY is 7.5% less expensive than Salem, OR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.8 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Salem buys about the same as $92,470 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair OR:NY 103.6→95.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -7.8 RPP
Diff -5.6 RPP
Diff +24.8 RPP
Diff -29.3 RPP
| Category | Salem | Buffalo-Cheektowaga | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 95.8 | -7.8 |
| Goods | 105.3 | 99.7 | -5.6 |
| Services | 104.7 | 129.5 | +24.8 |
| Rents | 110.3 | 81.0 | -29.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 29.3 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY is 7.5% less expensive than Salem, OR, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Salem is above 100 while Buffalo-Cheektowaga is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Salem corresponds to $92,470 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga.
What a salary in Salem would need to be in Buffalo-Cheektowaga for the same purchasing power:
| In Salem | In Buffalo-Cheektowaga | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,235 | $-3,765 |
| $75,000 | $69,352 | $-5,648 |
| $100,000 | $92,470 | $-7,530 |
| $150,000 | $138,705 | $-11,295 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 95.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Salem and Buffalo-Cheektowaga share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 2.9 to 7.8 RPP points. Salem remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 20.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.1 to 29.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Salem RPP | Buffalo-Cheektowaga RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 2.9 points Buffalo-Cheektowaga higher |
| 2012 | 101.1 | 96.2 | 4.9 points Salem higher |
| 2016 | 97.1 | 97.5 | 0.4 points Buffalo-Cheektowaga higher |
| 2020 | 100.9 | 94.2 | 6.8 points Salem higher |
| 2024 | 103.6 | 95.8 | 7.8 points Salem higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 7.5% less expensive than Salem. The overall cost index is 95.8 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Salem has the same purchasing power as $92,470 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Salem are indexed at 110.3 while Buffalo-Cheektowaga is at 81.0 (national average = 100). Salem has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.