Overall
Diff -0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kokomo is 0.6% less expensive than Rome.
Kokomo, IN is 0.6% less expensive than Rome, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.6 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Rome buys about the same as $99,431 in Kokomo; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair GA:IN 90.2→89.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Rome, GA and Kokomo, IN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Kokomo 4.5 points lower than Rome. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Rome to $99,431 in Kokomo, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.5 RPP
Diff -2.0 RPP
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff -1.0 RPP
| Category | Rome | Kokomo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.2 | 89.6 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 94.3 | -2.0 |
| Services | 90.7 | 86.3 | -4.5 |
| Rents | 60.3 | 59.3 | -1.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rome and Kokomo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.4 to 0.5 RPP points. Rome remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.6 to 4.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Rome RPP | Kokomo RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.0 | 92.3 | 4.4 points Kokomo higher |
| 2012 | 86.3 | 90.7 | 4.4 points Kokomo higher |
| 2016 | 88.3 | 87.7 | 0.6 points Rome higher |
| 2020 | 86.3 | 88.5 | 2.1 points Kokomo higher |
| 2024 | 90.2 | 89.6 | 0.5 points Rome higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Rome would need to be in Kokomo for the same purchasing power:
| In Rome | In Kokomo | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,716 | $-284 |
| $75,000 | $74,573 | $-427 |
| $100,000 | $99,431 | $-569 |
| $150,000 | $149,147 | $-853 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 89.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kokomo is 0.6% less expensive than Rome. The overall cost index is 89.6 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Rome has the same purchasing power as $99,431 in Kokomo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Rome are indexed at 60.3 while Kokomo is at 59.3 (national average = 100). Rome has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.