Overall
Diff +0.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fargo is 0.8% more expensive than Rome.
Fargo, ND-MN is 0.8% more expensive than Rome, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Rome buys about the same as $100,787 in Fargo; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair GA:ND 90.2→90.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Rome, GA and Fargo, ND-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.7 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Fargo is 20.9 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Rome corresponds to $100,787 in Fargo.
Diff +0.7 RPP
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff -13.4 RPP
Diff +20.9 RPP
| Category | Rome | Fargo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.2 | 90.9 | +0.7 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 95.7 | -0.6 |
| Services | 90.7 | 77.3 | -13.4 |
| Rents | 60.3 | 81.1 | +20.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rome and Fargo share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 9.3 to 0.7 RPP points. Fargo remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.9 to 13.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Rome RPP | Fargo RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.0 | 97.3 | 9.3 points Fargo higher |
| 2012 | 86.3 | 95.9 | 9.6 points Fargo higher |
| 2016 | 88.3 | 95.4 | 7.1 points Fargo higher |
| 2020 | 86.3 | 92.5 | 6.1 points Fargo higher |
| 2024 | 90.2 | 90.9 | 0.7 points Fargo higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Rome would need to be in Fargo for the same purchasing power:
| In Rome | In Fargo | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,394 | +$394 |
| $75,000 | $75,591 | +$591 |
| $100,000 | $100,787 | +$787 |
| $150,000 | $151,181 | +$1,181 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fargo is 0.8% more expensive than Rome. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Rome has the same purchasing power as $100,787 in Fargo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Rome are indexed at 60.3 while Fargo is at 81.1 (national average = 100). Fargo has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.