Rome vs Clarksville

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Clarksville is 0.9% more expensive than Rome.

0.9% more expensive

Clarksville, TN-KY is 0.9% more expensive than Rome, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Rome buys about the same as $100,872 in Clarksville; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 90.2 (Rome) vs 90.9 (Clarksville)
  • $100k in Rome ≈ $100,872 purchasing power in Clarksville
  • Services drives the gap (-18.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair GA:TN 90.2→90.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE GA × TN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Rome
90.2
Cost Index
Clarksville
90.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rome, GA and Clarksville, TN-KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Clarksville is 18.2 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Rome to $100,872 in Clarksville, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Rome
90.2
Clarksville
90.9
Goods
Rome
96.3
Clarksville
96.2
Services
Rome
90.7
Clarksville
72.5
Rents
Rome
60.3
Clarksville
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Rome and Clarksville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.5 to 0.8 RPP points. Clarksville remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.7 to 13.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Rome RPP Clarksville RPP Relative Gap
2008 88.0 90.5 2.5 points Clarksville higher
2012 86.3 93.0 6.7 points Clarksville higher
2016 88.3 93.6 5.3 points Clarksville higher
2020 86.3 88.8 2.4 points Clarksville higher
2024 90.2 90.9 0.8 points Clarksville higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Rome would need to be in Clarksville for the same purchasing power:

In Rome In Clarksville Difference
$50,000 $50,436 +$436
$75,000 $75,654 +$654
$100,000 $100,872 +$872
$150,000 $151,308 +$1,308
$ in Rome = in Clarksville

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Clarksville more expensive than Rome?

Clarksville is 0.9% more expensive than Rome. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Clarksville equals $100K in Rome?

A $100,000 salary in Rome has the same purchasing power as $100,872 in Clarksville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Rome and Clarksville?

Rents in Rome are indexed at 60.3 while Clarksville is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Clarksville has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.