Overall
- Reno
- 101.0
Diff +1.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 1.5% more expensive than Reno.
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD is 1.5% more expensive than Reno, NV on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.6 vs 101.0). A $100,000 salary in Reno buys about the same as $101,525 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NV:PA 101.0→102.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Reno, NV and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 25.1 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Reno to $101,525 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +1.5 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +25.1 RPP
Diff -10.3 RPP
| Category | Reno | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.0 | 102.6 | +1.5 |
| Goods | 96.3 | 96.8 | +0.6 |
| Services | 89.3 | 114.4 | +25.1 |
| Rents | 123.5 | 113.1 | -10.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Reno would need to be in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington for the same purchasing power:
| In Reno | In Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,762 | +$762 |
| $75,000 | $76,143 | +$1,143 |
| $100,000 | $101,525 | +$1,525 |
| $150,000 | $152,287 | +$2,287 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.0 → 102.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is 1.5% more expensive than Reno. The overall cost index is 102.6 vs 101.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Reno has the same purchasing power as $101,525 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Reno are indexed at 123.5 while Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington is at 113.1 (national average = 100). Reno has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.