Overall
- Albuquerque
- 95.5
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Albuquerque is 0.4% less expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant.
Albuquerque, NM is 0.4% less expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 96.0). A $100,000 salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant buys about the same as $99,568 in Albuquerque; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:NM 96.0→95.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI and Albuquerque, NM are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Albuquerque is 12.2 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Racine-Mount Pleasant to $99,568 in Albuquerque, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff +2.4 RPP
Diff -12.2 RPP
Diff -2.9 RPP
| Category | Racine-Mount Pleasant | Albuquerque | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.0 | 95.5 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.1 | +2.4 |
| Services | 90.0 | 77.9 | -12.2 |
| Rents | 92.0 | 89.2 | -2.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Racine-Mount Pleasant and Albuquerque share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 0.6 to 0.4 RPP points. Racine-Mount Pleasant remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.2 to 2.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Racine-Mount Pleasant RPP | Albuquerque RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.3 | 97.0 | 0.6 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 99.6 | 5.1 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2016 | 94.6 | 96.6 | 2.0 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2020 | 93.9 | 94.2 | 0.3 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2024 | 96.0 | 95.5 | 0.4 points Racine-Mount Pleasant higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant would need to be in Albuquerque for the same purchasing power:
| In Racine-Mount Pleasant | In Albuquerque | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,784 | $-216 |
| $75,000 | $74,676 | $-324 |
| $100,000 | $99,568 | $-432 |
| $150,000 | $149,351 | $-649 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.0 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Albuquerque is 0.4% less expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 96.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant has the same purchasing power as $99,568 in Albuquerque. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Racine-Mount Pleasant are indexed at 92.0 while Albuquerque is at 89.2 (national average = 100). Racine-Mount Pleasant has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.