Overall
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Omaha is 0.2% more expensive than Pueblo.
Omaha, NE-IA is 0.2% more expensive than Pueblo, CO on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.9 vs 91.8). A $100,000 salary in Pueblo buys about the same as $100,162 in Omaha; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair CO:NE 91.8→91.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Pueblo, CO and Omaha, NE-IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Omaha is 15.1 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Pueblo corresponds to $100,162 in Omaha.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -2.0 RPP
Diff -5.6 RPP
Diff +15.1 RPP
| Category | Pueblo | Omaha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.8 | 91.9 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 94.1 | -2.0 |
| Services | 81.9 | 76.4 | -5.6 |
| Rents | 71.3 | 86.4 | +15.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Pueblo and Omaha share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.7 to 0.1 RPP points. Omaha remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.7 to 5.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Pueblo RPP | Omaha RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.4 | 96.0 | 4.7 points Omaha higher |
| 2012 | 96.2 | 95.7 | 0.5 points Pueblo higher |
| 2016 | 93.2 | 94.6 | 1.4 points Omaha higher |
| 2020 | 90.1 | 95.0 | 4.8 points Omaha higher |
| 2024 | 91.8 | 91.9 | 0.1 points Omaha higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Pueblo would need to be in Omaha for the same purchasing power:
| In Pueblo | In Omaha | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,081 | +$81 |
| $75,000 | $75,122 | +$122 |
| $100,000 | $100,162 | +$162 |
| $150,000 | $150,244 | +$244 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.8 → 91.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Omaha is 0.2% more expensive than Pueblo. The overall cost index is 91.9 vs 91.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pueblo has the same purchasing power as $100,162 in Omaha. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pueblo are indexed at 71.3 while Omaha is at 86.4 (national average = 100). Omaha has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.