Overall
- Provo-Orem-Lehi
- 98.2
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
Diff +5.4 RPP
Provo-Orem-Lehi vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 5.5% more expensive than Provo-Orem-Lehi.
5.5% more expensive
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 5.5% more expensive than Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 98.2). A $100,000 salary in Provo-Orem-Lehi buys about the same as $105,460 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin; the largest component gap is goods.
- Overall RPP 98.2 (Provo-Orem-Lehi) vs 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin)
- $100k in Provo-Orem-Lehi ≈ $105,460 purchasing power in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- Goods drives the gap (+10.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair UT:IL 98.2→103.6
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE UT × IL
- GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 5.5% more expensive than Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Provo-Orem-Lehi is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Goods leads the difference, with Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 10.8 points higher than Provo-Orem-Lehi. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $105,460 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Provo-Orem-Lehi, then replace the national basket with your own.
Provo-Orem-Lehi
98.2
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Provo-Orem-Lehi and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.3 to 5.4 RPP points. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 19.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (23.9 to 5.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Provo-Orem-Lehi RPP | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.1 | 105.4 | 8.3 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2012 | 100.4 | 105.1 | 4.7 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2016 | 97.0 | 103.8 | 6.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2020 | 94.8 | 104.5 | 9.7 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2024 | 98.2 | 103.6 | 5.4 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Provo-Orem-Lehi
- 96.4
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 107.3
Diff +10.8 RPP
Services
- Provo-Orem-Lehi
- 78.6
Diff +5.0 RPP
Rents
- Provo-Orem-Lehi
- 104.1
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 112.0
Diff +7.9 RPP
| Category | Provo-Orem-Lehi | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.2 | 103.6 | +5.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 107.3 | +10.8 |
| Services | 78.6 | 83.6 | +5.0 |
| Rents | 104.1 | 112.0 | +7.9 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Provo-Orem-Lehi 98.2
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 103.6
Goods
Provo-Orem-Lehi 96.4
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 107.3
Services
Provo-Orem-Lehi 78.6
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 83.6
Rents
Provo-Orem-Lehi 104.1
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 112.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Provo-Orem-Lehi would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:
| In Provo-Orem-Lehi | In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,730 | +$2,730 |
| $75,000 | $79,095 | +$4,095 |
| $100,000 | $105,460 | +$5,460 |
| $150,000 | $158,189 | +$8,189 |
$ in Provo-Orem-Lehi = in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.2 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than Provo-Orem-Lehi?
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 5.5% more expensive than Provo-Orem-Lehi. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 98.2 (national average = 100).
What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in Provo-Orem-Lehi?
A $100,000 salary in Provo-Orem-Lehi has the same purchasing power as $105,460 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Provo-Orem-Lehi and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Rents in Provo-Orem-Lehi are indexed at 104.1 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.