Overall
- Port St. Lucie
- 100.2
Diff +2.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Port St. Lucie is 2% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Port St. Lucie, FL is 2% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.2 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $102,008 in Port St. Lucie; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:FL 98.3→100.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ and Port St. Lucie, FL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 2.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Port St. Lucie is 14.9 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Port St. Lucie is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott corresponds to $102,008 in Port St. Lucie.
Diff +2.0 RPP
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff -4.4 RPP
Diff +14.9 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Port St. Lucie | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 100.2 | +2.0 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | +0.0 |
| Services | 91.5 | 87.0 | -4.4 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 113.6 | +14.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Prescott Valley-Prescott and Port St. Lucie share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.9 to 2.0 RPP points. Port St. Lucie remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 12.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.5 to 4.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Port St. Lucie RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.0 | 101.1 | 1.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 99.2 | 2.6 points Port St. Lucie higher |
| 2016 | 98.6 | 100.5 | 1.9 points Port St. Lucie higher |
| 2020 | 93.2 | 98.6 | 5.4 points Port St. Lucie higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 100.2 | 2.0 points Port St. Lucie higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Port St. Lucie for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Port St. Lucie | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,004 | +$1,004 |
| $75,000 | $76,506 | +$1,506 |
| $100,000 | $102,008 | +$2,008 |
| $150,000 | $153,012 | +$3,012 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 100.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Port St. Lucie is 2% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 100.2 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $102,008 in Port St. Lucie. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Port St. Lucie is at 113.6 (national average = 100). Port St. Lucie has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.